Some argue that the high heritability of IQ renders purely environmental explanations for large IQ
differences between groups implausible. Yet, large environmentally induced IQ gains between generations
suggest an important role for environment in shaping IQ. The authors present a formal model of the
process determining IQ in which people's IQs are affected by both environment and genes, but in which
their environments are matched to their IQs. The authors show how such a model allows very large
effects for environment, even incorporating the highest estimates of heritability. Besides resolving the
paradox, the authors show that the model can account for a number of other phenomena, some of which
are anomalous when viewed from the standard perspective.
In this article, the authors argue that the overwhelming portion of the literature on intelligence, race, and genetics is based on folk taxonomies rather than scientific analysis. They suggest that because theorists of intelligence disagree as to what it is, any consideration of its relationships to other constructs must be tentative at best. They further argue that race is a social construction with no scientific definition. Thus, studies of the relationship between race and other constructs may serve social ends but cannot serve scientific ends. No gene has yet been conclusively linked to intelligence, so attempts to provide a compelling genetic link of race to intelligence are not feasible at this time. The authors also show that heritability, a behaviorgenetic concept, is inadequate in regard to providing such a link.
Over the last century, IQ scores have been steadily rising, a phenomenon dubbed the Flynn effect. Because of the
Flynn effect, IQ tests are periodically renormed, making them harder. Given that eligibility for mental retardation
(MR) services relies heavily on IQ scores, renormed tests could have a significant impact on MR placements. In
longitudinal IQ records from 9 sites around the country, students in the borderline and mild MR range lost an
average of 5.6 points when retested on a renormed test and were more likely to be classified MR compared with peers retested on the same test. The magnitude of the effect is large and affects national policies on education, social security, the death penalty, and the military.
Website > Psychological Topics > Intelligence http://www.apa.org/topics/intelligence/index.aspx
Articles
Some argue that the high heritability of IQ renders purely environmental explanations for large IQ
differences between groups implausible. Yet, large environmentally induced IQ gains between generations
suggest an important role for environment in shaping IQ. The authors present a formal model of the
process determining IQ in which people's IQs are affected by both environment and genes, but in which
their environments are matched to their IQs. The authors show how such a model allows very large
effects for environment, even incorporating the highest estimates of heritability. Besides resolving the
paradox, the authors show that the model can account for a number of other phenomena, some of which
are anomalous when viewed from the standard perspective.
In this article, the authors argue that the overwhelming portion of the literature on intelligence, race, and genetics is based on folk taxonomies rather than scientific analysis. They suggest that because theorists of intelligence disagree as to what it is, any consideration of its relationships to other constructs must be tentative at best. They further argue that race is a social construction with no scientific definition. Thus, studies of the relationship between race and other constructs may serve social ends but cannot serve scientific ends. No gene has yet been conclusively linked to intelligence, so attempts to provide a compelling genetic link of race to intelligence are not feasible at this time. The authors also show that heritability, a behaviorgenetic concept, is inadequate in regard to providing such a link.
Over the last century, IQ scores have been steadily rising, a phenomenon dubbed the Flynn effect. Because of the
Flynn effect, IQ tests are periodically renormed, making them harder. Given that eligibility for mental retardation
(MR) services relies heavily on IQ scores, renormed tests could have a significant impact on MR placements. In
longitudinal IQ records from 9 sites around the country, students in the borderline and mild MR range lost an
average of 5.6 points when retested on a renormed test and were more likely to be classified MR compared with peers retested on the same test. The magnitude of the effect is large and affects national policies on education, social security, the death penalty, and the military.
WEBSITE:
Human Intelligence: Historical Influences, Current Controversies, Teaching Resources
Indiana University
http://www.indiana.edu/~intell/index.shtml
This site includes biographical profiles of people who have influenced the development of intelligence theory and testing, in-depth articles exploring current controversies related to human intelligence, and resources for teachers.
IQ ZONE
http://www.knowl.demon.co.uk/page9.html.
GENERAL INTELLIGENCE
http://nicologic.free.fr/GeneralIntelligence.htm.
INTELLIGENCE AND CREATIVITY
http://inst.santafe.cc.fl.us/~mwehr/StudyGHB/11Ovr_Int.htm.
The Unconscious Bias of Intelligence Tests
http://www.southernct.edu/organizations/hcr/2001/nonfiction/testbias.htm